MOOG G123-825-001 緩沖放大器 主要采用現有的伺服放大器輸出
MOOG G123-825-001 緩沖放大器接口用于標準PLC±10v, 4-20ma的模擬輸出信號的輸入端和穆格閥的輸出端。這就解決了這些信號與閥門要求之間的兼容住問題。機械反饋(mfb)閥輸入:G123-825接口的一端是伺服放大器的電流輸出，另一端是穆格閥。
這使得舊的mfb閥被現代電子反饋(efb)閥所取代，而無需改變伺服放大器。緩沖放大器采用現有的伺服放大器輸出，并將其轉換為efb兼容信號。輸入濾波器:G123-825有一個濾波器來去除輸入信號中的噪聲。濾波器時間常數是開關可選的。開關選擇和，所以大量的時間常數是可用的。通用編碼器和靈活的計數器模塊CD522模塊對定制的解決方案來說具有和動態靈活的特性。
MOOG G123-825-001 緩沖放大器它本身集成兩路獨立的編碼器輸入，并且能夠用Control Builder軟件設置10種不同的操作模式，且高計數頻率達300kHz。根據不同的編碼器模式，CD522也可以集成PWM脈沖驗出或普通的驗入和驗出。不同類型的編碼器。它們的信號、電壓、格式和使用方法也可能不同。編碼器的選擇完全取決于應用要求，例如用于位置、角度或速度的檢測。在某些情況下，增量式編碼器是更好的選擇，但在另外的情況下，可能就需要選擇編碼器。
MOOG G123-825-001 緩沖放大器 主要采用現有的伺服放大器輸出
MOOG G123-825-001 buffer amplifier interface for standard PLC±10v, 4-20ma analog output signal input and Moog valve output. This solves the problem of compatibility between these signals and valve requirements. Mechanical feedback (mfb) valve input: One end of the G123-825 interface is the current output of the servo amplifier, and the other end is the Moog valve.
This allows the old mfb valves to be replaced by modern electronic feedback (efb) valves without changing the servo amplifier. The buffer amplifier takes the output of an existing servo amplifier and converts it into an efb compatible signal. Input filter: The G123-825 has a filter to remove noise from the input signal. The filter time constant is switch-optional. Switch selection and so a large number of time constants are available. Universal encoder and flexible counter module The CD522 module is dynamic and flexible for custom solutions.
The MOOG G123-825-001 buffer amplifier itself integrates two independent encoder inputs, and can set 10 different operating modes with Control Builder software, and a high count frequency of 300kHz. Depending on the encoder mode, the CD522 can also integrate PWM pulse check or normal check and check. Different types of encoders. They may also differ in signal, voltage, format, and usage. The choice of encoder depends entirely on the application requirements, such as for position, Angle or speed detection. In some cases, an incremental encoder is a better choice, but in other cases, an encoder may be required.
